How much influence does OPEC have on the global price of oil?
The Economics of Oil Extraction
Opec bid to kill off US shale sends oil price down to 2009 low
OPEC - Member Countries
Wednesday, December 21, 2016
Tuesday, December 20, 2016
Sunday, December 18, 2016
Friday, December 16, 2016
Loretta Fuddy
https://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/author/butterdezillion/
http://freedomoutpost.com/obama-birth-certificate-shocker-evidence-deceased-hawaii-health-director-loretta-fuddy-paid/
Loretta Fuddy's brother, Lewis Fuddy Jr., says that his sister didn't have any known heart problems (archive)
Makani Kai owner Richard Schuman ... has said previously that he has no idea why the engine failed. The plane had no previous problems, he said (archive)
The Strange Death of Loretta Fuddy and Why It Matters
Loretta Fuddy had come across anywhere from $50,000-$75,000
Wednesday, December 14, 2016
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
MSNBC Host Claims Fox News Had Christmas Party at Trump’s D.C. Hotel
MSNBC Host Claims Fox News Had Christmas Party at Trump’s D.C. Hotel
Amidst the media’s obsession with supposedly stopping fake news, MSNBC Live aired a fake news story of their own on Friday morning as the network informed viewers that “Fox News had their Christmas party” at President-elect Donald Trump’s Washington, D.C. hotel.
“I mean, think about the hotel in Washington right now. The RNC is having their Christmas party there. Fox News had their Christmas party there. That doesn't feel a little hanky,” host Stephanie Ruhle claimed just after 9:30 a.m. Eastern time while speaking to former Martin O’Malley aide Lis Smith and GOP strategist Brad Todd.
Roughly five hours later, Ruhle guest-hosted on MSNBC for Thomas Roberts and she used the opportunity to apologize in which she explained that she’s “since learned that neither Fox network nor an affiliate held any party at Trump’s Washington hotel”:
MSNBC calls man protesting Obamacare racist and shows only his firearms. Only problem is...
The man was an African American.
Sunday, December 11, 2016
Abortion
The basis of Roe v Wade:
Human Life Begins at Conception (this is science, not religion):
Life Begins at Fertilization
Scientists Attest To Life Beginning At Conception
"We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins . . . the judiciary at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."So when Roe v Wade was ruled upon, the SCOTUS said that it could not be determined when life begins (nor was it its jurisdiction). However:
"If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case [i.e. "Roe" who sought the abortion], of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment."So if scientists could ever determine when life begins, the 14th Amendment would protect the fetus' right to life. Thanks to the advent and understanding of science decades later, that has now been determined.
Human Life Begins at Conception (this is science, not religion):
Life Begins at Fertilization
Scientists Attest To Life Beginning At Conception
Tuesday, November 22, 2016
Gun Rights vs Gun Control
https://mic.com/articles/39683/gun-control-debate-universal-background-checks-aren-t-universal
Our current background checks aren't even fully enforced now. Also, they're missing a lot of data that could help in stopping bad people from acquiring a weapon. Why do we need to expand something when our politicians aren't doing anything to enforce the current system? The answer is simple: there would be no reason to continue infringing on your rights if the current system was actually being enforced like it was intended to. Politicians do this all the time--they drop the ball then demand that you hand over more freedoms. When does it stop?
Anyway, allow Joe Biden to explain it to you
______________________________________________
There is no gun-show loophole.
A loophole is defined as "an ambiguity or inadequacy in the law or a set of rules."
The Gun-show loophole is a misleading term in two ways: it's not a loophole and it's not limited to gun-shows.
What the Democrats really mean by it is that you can buy a gun from a private seller (not a Federal Firearms Licensed (FFL) seller who sells guns as a business) without the seller having to conduct a background check so long as you both are in the same state.
However, it is not a loophole:
- The current federal laws strictly states that all FFLs must conduct a background check.
- The law allows for private sales without a background check. The only time a private sale is required is if the buyer and the seller are in different states, in which case, the seller must ship to an FFL where a background check must be performed.
- Also, the law says if a background check is not required because it's a private sale, the private seller must conduct due diligence before they transfer the firearm. If they don't, they are liable should the purchaser commit a crime with the gun.
Now, here's the folly with the logic of "closing the gun-show loophole": it assumes that criminals follow the law. You know who are going to be the only ones complying with gun control legislation? The same people who currently comply with gun-control laws now: the law-abiding citizen. So in the end, nothing changes, except more erosion of our freedoms.
So why do they call it the gun show loophole? Because a private seller can go into a gun show and sell their gun without having to conduct a background check on the buyer. However, this is true anywhere. Why did they chose to target gun-shows? My guess is that the Democrats focus group probably felt "Gun-show loophole" was an awesome buzzword. It rhymes, it has the word "loophole" in it, which naturally, people associate as a bad thing, and uses the word gun-show which makes it seem like this madness is happening in an area where there are hundreds of firearms.
______________________________________________
This is not what it seems on the surface (are you starting to notice a pattern, yet?). Watch this short video to understand what they're really talking about, which is a slippery slope towards tyranny:
Comprehensive pre-purchase background checks
Our current background checks aren't even fully enforced now. Also, they're missing a lot of data that could help in stopping bad people from acquiring a weapon. Why do we need to expand something when our politicians aren't doing anything to enforce the current system? The answer is simple: there would be no reason to continue infringing on your rights if the current system was actually being enforced like it was intended to. Politicians do this all the time--they drop the ball then demand that you hand over more freedoms. When does it stop?
Anyway, allow Joe Biden to explain it to you
______________________________________________
closing the gun-show loophole
There is no gun-show loophole.
A loophole is defined as "an ambiguity or inadequacy in the law or a set of rules."
The Gun-show loophole is a misleading term in two ways: it's not a loophole and it's not limited to gun-shows.
What the Democrats really mean by it is that you can buy a gun from a private seller (not a Federal Firearms Licensed (FFL) seller who sells guns as a business) without the seller having to conduct a background check so long as you both are in the same state.
However, it is not a loophole:
- The current federal laws strictly states that all FFLs must conduct a background check.
- The law allows for private sales without a background check. The only time a private sale is required is if the buyer and the seller are in different states, in which case, the seller must ship to an FFL where a background check must be performed.
- Also, the law says if a background check is not required because it's a private sale, the private seller must conduct due diligence before they transfer the firearm. If they don't, they are liable should the purchaser commit a crime with the gun.
Now, here's the folly with the logic of "closing the gun-show loophole": it assumes that criminals follow the law. You know who are going to be the only ones complying with gun control legislation? The same people who currently comply with gun-control laws now: the law-abiding citizen. So in the end, nothing changes, except more erosion of our freedoms.
So why do they call it the gun show loophole? Because a private seller can go into a gun show and sell their gun without having to conduct a background check on the buyer. However, this is true anywhere. Why did they chose to target gun-shows? My guess is that the Democrats focus group probably felt "Gun-show loophole" was an awesome buzzword. It rhymes, it has the word "loophole" in it, which naturally, people associate as a bad thing, and uses the word gun-show which makes it seem like this madness is happening in an area where there are hundreds of firearms.
______________________________________________
Making sure that terrorists are not allowed to buy guns.
This is not what it seems on the surface (are you starting to notice a pattern, yet?). Watch this short video to understand what they're really talking about, which is a slippery slope towards tyranny:
Friday, November 18, 2016
Jeff Sessoins AG
In Alabama, Jeff Sessions Desegregated Schools and Got the Death Penalty for KKK Head (Archive link)
Sessions's actual track record certainly doesn't suggest he's a racist. Quite the opposite, in fact. As a U.S. Attorney he filed several cases to desegregate schools in Alabama. And he also prosecuted the head of the state Klan, Henry Francis Hays, for abducting and killing Michael Donald, a black teenager selected at random. Sessions insisted on the death penalty for Hays. When he was later elected the state Attorney General, Sessions followed through and made sure the Hays executed. The successful prosecution of Hays also led to a $7 million civil judgment against the Klan, effectively breaking the back of the KKK in Alabama.
Climate Change
Man-Made Climate Change is a Hoax.
The following video talks about the history of Climate Politics and goes over all the data.
Climategate - Hacked Emails Show Scientists Skewing Data
Global Cooling: Arctic Ice Cap Grows 60 Percent In A Year [NASA PHOTO]
Twenty Good Reasons Not To Worry About The Polar Bears - GWPF
An Inconvenient Review: After 10 Years Al Gore’s Film Is Still Alarmingly Inaccurate
FLASHBACK: ABC News Warns NYC Will Be Under Water by 2015 Due to Global Warming
We've lost the numbers: CRU responds to FOIA requests
Is 100% of US warming due to NOAA data tampering?
An research paper shared by /u/Fiat-Libertas
The following video talks about the history of Climate Politics and goes over all the data.
Climategate - Hacked Emails Show Scientists Skewing Data
Global Cooling: Arctic Ice Cap Grows 60 Percent In A Year [NASA PHOTO]
Twenty Good Reasons Not To Worry About The Polar Bears - GWPF
An Inconvenient Review: After 10 Years Al Gore’s Film Is Still Alarmingly Inaccurate
FLASHBACK: ABC News Warns NYC Will Be Under Water by 2015 Due to Global Warming
We've lost the numbers: CRU responds to FOIA requests
Is 100% of US warming due to NOAA data tampering?
An research paper shared by /u/Fiat-Libertas
Trump's Margin of Victory for 2016
Trump won 3084 of 3141 U.S. counties
Trump Won 30 States compared to Hillary winning 20 states.
Does anyone really think it's fair for the minority to impose their will on the vast majority? If so, you may want to reconsider the label "Democrat" seeing as you are anti-democracy.
Trump Won 30 States compared to Hillary winning 20 states.
Does anyone really think it's fair for the minority to impose their will on the vast majority? If so, you may want to reconsider the label "Democrat" seeing as you are anti-democracy.
Wednesday, November 16, 2016
Voter Fraud 2016 Elections
Studies
Unconfirmed
New York
Unconfirmed
New York
Florida
- Florida Election Officials Caught Filling Out Absentee Ballots, Affidavit Alleges #FloridaFraud
- It's in the mail, or is it? Broward voters lament vote-by-mail shortfalls
- Seminole elections office receives five stolen, forged absentee ballots
- Two women busted for election fraud in Miami-Dade
Indiana
California
Minnesota
Michigan
Pennsylvania
Nevada
Michigan
- Records: 95 Detroit poll books missing for several days
- Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts
- Hundreds Of Dead Chicagoans STILL VOTING, Some Decades After They Passed Away
- Thousands Of Possible Voter Fraud Cases Were Just Reported in Indiana
- IL Residents Report Being Offered Bribes For Voting Democrat
- Man Charged With Filing Fake Voter Registration Applications in Va.
- Alexandria man sentenced to 5 years in prison for forging voter registration applications
- Bombshell: Over 1,000 Illegal Voters in Eight Virginia Localities
Pennsylvania
- Proof: Thousands of GOP votes likely stolen in Pa.
- Illegal Voters Uncovered in Philly Are ‘Tip of the Iceberg’
Nevada
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)